ClubRoadster.net banner

1 - 8 of 8 Posts

·
Esteemed Member
Joined
·
4,380 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Mosley punts for new Formula 1 rules in 2011 said:
According to reports in today's F1 Racing monthly magazine, the FIA is now making the first steps towards the introduction of 2.2-litre V6 turbocharged engines, running on biodiesel fuels, in F1 in 2011. The reports suggest that the engines will be restricted to 10,000rpm and that they will have to survive for five Grand Prix. The idea, which we suggested might happen back in November last year is being proposed to the automobile manufacturers. It remains to be seen whether the proposals will be embraced by the car companies. In addition the proposals include a number of other controversial ideas, such as traction-control, four-wheel-drive, power-boost buttons and identical bodywork for all the teams. Some of these are idea have been pushed by FIA President Max Mosley in the past and are probably included in the proposals to see what he can achieve by throwing the net wide and seeing what survives.

The basic proposals make some sense, not least because all the major car manufacturers have 2.2-litre turbo diesel engines in their ranges, which means that there can be some commercial relevance and will make F1 attractive to companies that are not currently involved. These include firms such as Peugeot-Citroen, Hyundai, GM, Jaguar and Volkswagen. The sport could advertise the products and perhaps offer new scientific developments that could be applied to production cars.

Ten years ago Mosley commissioned a study of the motorsport industry by the Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR) which analysed how the ingenuity of the post-war engineer-drivers was translated into a vast and diverse industry as constant competition not only provoked continual technological breakthrough but also weeded out the companies which were not meant for success. As a result the industry was never able to stagnate. Each firm had to learn to master advancing technologies and those who could not cope failed. It was a question of the survival of the fittest as most of these firms were dedicated to motorsport and thus had to be competitive to survive as they had no other income on which to fall back.

Mosley's model for the future ties the hands of those who continue in that original tradition and, if accepted, would mean that much of their work, such as the building of vast and intricate windtunnels, will become irrelevant. It will thus be opposed with much vehemence. The most controversial proposal is the identical bodywork, something which undermines the foundations of pure competition on which F1 - and the entire motorsport industry - is based. Mosley argues that there can still be that kind of competition in other areas of machinery but that aerodynamic development is wasteful and has no relevance to the car industry.

Aerodynamics may be wasteful within the confines of the rules as they now are, as teams are forced to build cars that look similar to one another, but this is the factor that decides who wins and who loses.

The big question is whether or not the areas that are left open for development will ultimately soak up the same level of investment that the windtunnels now do. In all probability they will, because if racing teams can raise money, they will spend it in order to win.

If that spirit dies, the sport and the industry may die with it.
I'm not liking how the FIA is leading F1 into the future.


Another article from AutoBlog: http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/19/f1-could-go-back-to-turbo-v6-engines-running-on-biofuel/#comments
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,362 Posts
yea those rule changes would suck. Ive always thought of f1 as the highest, fastest, best technology series and this would really limit it; even more than it already is. In my mind it goes against the whole idea of f1.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,688 Posts
The turbodeisel v6s are an interesting idea, but the billowing clouds of black smoke and horrendous smell would probably be the death of the sport.

On the identical bodywork, I could get behind that if they then lifted engine/computer restrictions.
 

·
Esteemed Member
Joined
·
4,380 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
yea those rule changes would suck. Ive always thought of f1 as the highest, fastest, best technology series and this would really limit it; even more than it already is. In my mind it goes against the whole idea of f1.
Agreed. If they had identical body work, I might as well watch Indy or Champ car. Formula 1 is the pinnacle of motorsports in all aspects. It should stay that way.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
47 Posts
as the bigwig's get older, they tend to concentrate on what other older people look at, which does not jive with what others 40 and below look at. i can understand their reasoning, and it makes sense, but i don't think i would've done it too F1. Besides look at what audi is doing with ALMS and Le manns, they are making peugeot counter-act they move with the R10
 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Top